In an interesting article in the Guardian Madeleine Gabriel from the social entrepreneurship organisation UnLtd explores the reasons why older people are less likely to start this type of endeavour. The article is linked to the recent publication of UnLtd’s research report Golden Opportunities, Social Entrepreneurs in an ageing society.
She reveals that although over-50s comprise 44% of the UK adult population, they account for only 18% of UnLtd’s Award Winners, a finding which appears to be borne out by data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2009) which suggests that the over-55s are less likely to be involved in social entrepreneurship than most other age groups.
UnLtd believe that social entrepreneurship can give people a way to maintain economic and social activity into later life. The activity of being a social entrepreneur in itself has potential to help tackle some of the issues of an ageing society – over and above the social impact created by the work of these ventures.
Reasons for this low representation seem to be that, although voluntary activity is high amongst people aged over 50, there might be significant numbers of people in this age group who UnLtd would call social entrepreneurs but who wouldn’t recognise themselves as such.
Apparently, for many of the older individuals UnLtd interviewed, the language of social entrepreneurship “didn’t feel right”; they tended to associate the word ‘entrepreneur’ simply with making money. They felt “social entrepreneur” didn’t reflect their missions or their ventures, many of which were run on a voluntary basis.
Other barriers highlighted in the report were older people’s lack of understanding about social entrepreneurship, wariness about the credibility of UnLtd’s funding offer, and older people’s lack of confidence in their ability to take up the offer.
So – lack of understanding, lack of identification, lack of confidence or lack of knowledge? Probably all of these and more. Building on the language issue already identified, our own experience of social innovation organisations (plus limited informal feedback from others) reveals that many have a preoccupation with jargon and process at the expense of plain english and action.
There’s an unfortunate tendency to patronise older people by viewing them as a sector who need things doing to them or for them by people who know what’s good for them. Add to this a lack of understanding of the significant age and capability differentials in what is a 50 year “over 50” age span and it’s all quite irritating and offputting.
We’re not implying for a moment that UnLtd exhibits any of these shortcomings, but we have found them elsewhere. That said, the strength of the “social entrepreneurship” sector in the US as evidenced by the winners of the Purpose Prize (http://www.encore.org/prize) and other inspiring stories, adds weight to UnLtd’s argument that this activity seems to have a natural appeal for older people.
Ultimately more publicity, more role models and more workplace education about post-mainstream work options might help attract greater over 50s involvement. Or will it take much more than that?
https://socialenterprise.guardian.co.uk/en/articles/social-enterprise-network/2012/feb/08/older-social-entrepreneurs?CMP=