Saving for retirement – the biscuit tin approach

Hardly a day goes by now without another piece of depressing information about the state of the nation’s pensions. In the last few days alone we have seen more defined benefit schemes closing, more reports on the lack of savings that individuals are making particularly during the recession, and soaring bankruptcy numbers among pensioners. One report, highlighting the fact that many are now unable to foresee when they might retire or how they might have adequate savings to live on, has  coined the term “baby gloomers”  to describe the plight that people feel they are in.

The advice that comes from the financial industry is plentiful but very self-serving: “save more for a pension”; “release some equity from your home”; “tuck your money away in an ISA”; “invest in buy-to let”; and more. The government believes that the answer lies in personal accounts which everyone will flock to in a few years’ time – we will see.

Many people, knowing their savings are insufficient but not by how much, would like to work longer, certainly past 65. Yet the government is still dragging its heels in a most extraordinary fashion. This is despite the fact that change is inevitable. The state pension age will be increasing to 68 in the coming years but the default retirement age is currently 65. What are people going to do –starve for three years? One glimmer of hope that the recession is providing is that firms are beginning to see the futility of redundancy as an answer to their problems and are looking at more innovative ways of managing the current problems with flexible arrangements, part-time working, sabbaticals etc. all now featuring. These are also ideal tools for dealing with an ageing workforce.

However, the first problem that must be addressed is one of awareness. There is, in the country as a whole, an order of magnitude lack of understanding among people of all ages as to exactly what it takes in financial terms to retire in some form of comfort. A fundamental and far reaching “reality check” is needed to reconcile the aspirational dream of an interesting, financially secure retirement with the ongoing provision that individuals are making through their working lives.

Retirement financial planning involves running up a store of wealth, retiring, and then running it down again over the course of the rest of our life – as simple as that. Building up a retirement pot is very much like tucking money away in a biscuit tin each week to save for Christmas – except Christmas may last twenty years or more.

For more see  Saving for retirement – the biscuit tin approach

Pension Reform and Personal Accounts after the Credit Crunch

Last Tuesday (24^th March) the International Longevity Centre-UK (ILC-UK) and the Actuarial Profession hosted a Joint Debate at the Institute of Actuaries in London on aspects of pension reform and personal accounts and the implications of the current credit crunch.

Chaired by Baroness Sally Greengross and introduced by a speech from Nigel Waterson MP, Shadow Pensions Minister and Shadow Minister for Older People, the 2-hour session was remarkably interesting (if you’re into that kind of thing) and was extremely well-attended, mostly by people from within the pensions, actuarial and financial services industry.

As this was a debate mainly consisting of people inside the industry “looking out” there was a substantial element of “preaching to the basically converted” and much of the debate was about the “how” of saving for one’s old age and whether this did the trick. There was, therefore, a lot of comment regarding what one might consider to be the technicalities of structuring and operating a pension scheme. Also, running through, was the (unsupported) hope that people would move away from property as the means to save and back towards pensions.

In this latter respect research by the Pensions Policy Institute, represented by Niki Cleal, was particularly revealing. Her comment was, in a nutshell, that those who saved probably saved across the board, that is pensions, property and ISAs etc., in contrast to those who probably had little of any. This is not a case of substitution and changing asset allocation.

Rather, we believe,  this is due to:-

1)       the lack of sufficient resources for people to be able to save at the current time, or possibly any time

2)       the phenomenal lack of understanding, generally, of what it will take to support oneself in old age in an appropriate style and over an extended and growing potential lifespan.

It is, therefore, the “why” people need to save that must also be addressed. There is an enormous educational task to be undertaken among the population in general and, until this is carried out, even the best designed schemes will have difficulty in succeeding. But all this is manageable given the will.

We are not talking deckchairs, shuffling, Titanic…yet.